Archive for the 'Random Thoughts/Observations' Category



05
Sep
10

The Sample Series: Parliament Funkadelic

One thing that is a standard in the music industry since the 80′s has been using an old school hits to make a new one. The Sample Series is highlighting that aspect in contemporary black music and gives the readers a chance to also go back in time and take inventory of how far (or not so far) we have become in the progression of music.

When you talk about the beginnings of funk music, NO conversation can be had without including George Clinton Parliament Funkadelic. As many of my older relatives can attest to, when Parliament hit the scene, they ran through the streets like a hurricane. To this day, Parliament is a staple in any old school party you go to, and a staple in Soul Train lines at family reunions anywhere. In addition, two of their hits have become unofficial theme songs for the brothers of Omega Psi Phi (Atomic Dog) and Kappa Alpha Psi (Flashlight, at least in the southern region). As a tribute to Parliament, I picked out some songs that have sampled the P-Funk. There were a couple that indirectly mentioned in my blog about Zapp and Roger that sampled Parliament’s “Flashlight”, so I won’t include those in this entry. If I missed some, definitely leave a comment and share your thoughts.

MC Hammer – Turn this Mutha Out (sampled from Parliament’s “Give up the Funk”)

Dr. Dre – Let Me Ride (sampled from Parliament’s “Mothership Connection”)

Digital Underground – Same Song (sampled from Parliament’s “Theme from the Black Hole”)

De La Soul – Me, Myself, and I (sampled from Parliament’s Knee Deep)

X-Clan – Funkin’ Lesson (sampled from Parliament’s “One Nation Under a Groove” and “Knee Deep”)

Ice Cube – Bop Gun (sampled from Parliament’s “One Nation Under a Groove”)

Guy – Teddy’s Jam 2 (Sampled from George Clinton’s “Atomic Dog”)

Ice Cube – The N—- you Love to Hate (sampled from “Atomic Dog”)

MC Hammer – Pumps and a Bump (sampled from “Atomic Dog”)

Crucial Conflict – Hay (sampled from Parliament’s “I’ll Stay”)

That’s enough for now. Trust and believe there are countless more that are feeding the pockets of George Clinton to this day. Which one is your favorite? Let me hear your thoughts.

05
Sep
10

The Sample Series: “More Bounce to the Ounce”

One thing that is a standard in the music industry since the 80′s has been using an old school hits to make a new one. The Sample Series is highlighting that aspect in contemporary black music and gives the readers a chance to also go back in time and take inventory of how far (or not so far) we have become in the progression of music.

Growing up in LA, there were a lot of things that were a standard of living there: year round great weather, the Lakers, and Zapp on the radio. Years after thei albums dropped, Zapp and Roger records still got constant air play in LA, and this music became somewhat of an anthem for the gangstas and hustlas in LA. You could be at an party, and no matter what was going on, you drop this beat right here, and everyone (even the hardest dude) would hit the dance floor:

Of course this was the banger all over the country when it dropped (when I was a baby), but out in Cali it all but created the standard for West Coast Hip Hop. However, More Bounce is one of Zapp and Roger’s more heavily sampled songs. With that being said, I’m opening it up to my readers to have an informal debate on which song you think has done the best sample of this song. Thanks to WhoSampled.com, along with songs I remember off top, I was able to pick out what I feel are the best samples. Here they are:

EPMD – You Gots to Chill (this one here is the most known one across the country, and they also sample Kool and the Gang’s “Jungle Boogie” on this one as well):

X-Clan – Heed the Word of the Brother (which also uses Parliament’s “Flashlight”):

Rodney O and Joe Cooley – You Don’t Hear Me Though (also using Parliament’s “Flashlight”, just like X-Clan, and I apologize that this isn’t the clean version):

The Late Mc Breed and the DFC – Ain’t No Future in Yo’ Frontin’:

Coolio – County Line

Biggie Smalls – Going Back to Cali (it’s not as obvious as the other ones, but it definitely has the elements, and once again sorry for the non-clean version):

Slum Village – Do You

OK, let the debate begin.

16
Aug
10

Summer 2010 Colonic Series: Light Privilege, A Blessed Curse

Ok everyone, I’ve been putting this one off for years now, and now it’s time to finally speak about a big elephant in the room of the African-American community.

I will cut right to it……………. we have all seen the “Good and Bad Hair” scene from School Daze, heard the difference between the typical complexion of house negroes versus yard/field negroes, know about the paper bag parties that used to be practiced at Howard, Spelman, Morehouse, and other HBCU’s. We’ve talked about it to the point of exhaustion for as long as the African-American has existed, right? So why is it that we as black folks still deal with and talk about this?

The answer’s pretty simple……. it’s because no matter how much we run away from it, no matter how “inclusive” we have become within Black America (personally and professionally), it STILL matters.

When I was in business school a few years back, I was at an event and ran into an undergrad who at the time was president of the Howard University Student Association. We were talking about something, then I said “Aight man, I see you working that light privilege.” We both fell out laughing about it, but there was a little truth to the joke that I made (just like most jokes we make). Afterwards, I thought about what I just said, and thought that it was interesting, even then, that it’s still a true statement.

Some of you are wondering what I mean when I say “light privilege”. The way I define “light privilege” is how those of African descent who have fairer skin are more likely to be considered beautiful and attractive, intelligent, more pleasant, and “better” than those of darker complexion; not just by our own, but also by “mainstream America” as well. This theme is directly comparable to the Tim Wise theory on White Privilege, and reinforced by a recent blog entry from The Root comparing the media reaction to Two R&B Singing Homewreckers within the Black Community.

To go even further, ask yourself this question: How many more records would Angie Stone, India Arie, and Fantasia had sold if they looked like Alicia Keys, Rihanna, Ciara, or Beyonce? Then ask yourself this… are you subconsciously thinking the latter set of paper bag passing women are automatically better looking? I know I did (in a King Geoffrey Joffer voice). And you know what, so do they, and so does most people. After all, light skinned women are better looking, right?

Let’s be real: To show you how we view fair complexion blacks in our community (from a hater’s perspective) if I described to you a woman who is stuck up, pledged AKA or Delta at a HBCU, always has guys falling all over her, can’t cook, is mean, needy, and will slash your tires if you ever left her………….. or if I described a man who walks in the club, dresses real refined, and is narcissistic, pompous jerk who expects women to holla at him and buy HIM drinks (yes I actually know people like this, and it’s sad); what would be your first image of who this respective female and male could be? It definitely wouldn’t be in the image of Mo’Nique or Rickey Smiley would it?

In some instances, being “light” is not always a blessing; sometimes it can be a “detriment”. Months ago, my big sister in blog at Black ‘n’ Bougie wrote an entry related to how skin color is still an issue, even in 2010. Other than the general theme of the article, what stuck out to me was a conversation she overheard in Walmart about a mother who was glad her son was dark skinned because “She did not want her boy to look like ‘no punk’”. Believe it or not, subconsciously, gangsta rappers excluded, we associate a man’s skin tone with his level of masculinity (and ability to be a protector) in most cases. I didn’t have to deal with that aspect too much until I moved out Southern Cali. Speaking of……….

Now to tell on myself a little bit. Growing up in LA, a city where your body and your looks are the fashion and not your clothes, I had to deal with both the blessings and curses of being of fairer complexion. In LA, most who were of fairer complexion always “got the guy/girl”, especially at my high school. If you were light skinned, had “good hair”, and didn’t have dark brown eyes, you could write your own ticket with the opposite sex. Did I buy into it back in the day? I would be lying if I said no. And honestly (telling on myself here), I even put my hat in the ring back in 11th grade when I rocked the S-Curl and threw some hazel contacts in eyes (only VIP folks get to see the visual evidence of that, so don’t go stalking my facebook photo albums because it’s not there, sorry). Once I did that, the amount of women I knew in high school DOUBLED within a semester. Go figure! By the time I reached senior year, I shut that experiment down and went back to the short cut with regular contacts. The same women would still talk to me, but they weren’t as interested anymore when I stopped playing the “light skinned pretty boy” game, even though I was pegged as a future Kappa all throughout senior year of high school, even by faculty of my high school (no diss to the Nupes, but somebody done told them wrong, LOL).

Has my complexion helped me to get opportunities I wouldn’t have received otherwise over the course of my life? I don’t think so. I believe that I have legitimately earned my place in this world based on what’s in the head, and not what’s on the outside. Of course, some may never vocalize it, but some will believe my looks and skin tone had something to do with it. If looks were that powerful, I would already be further along in my career than I am now. One of these days, we may evolve as a people and begin to stop being hypocrites and hold each other accountable for the way we treat each other the same way we look to hold white Americans accountable for how they treat us. We are all beautiful, dynamic, talented, and special in the eyes of God (in our unique ways), regardless of how much melanin we have. I know this blog entry won’t provide the cure, but at least it calls out that centuries old elephant in the room, which is what my intention was.

What has been your experience with this concept over your lifetime? Has it been more of a blessing or curse for you? We all come from different backgrounds, so our experiences will be different. Go ‘head and share…………

12
Jun
10

Summer 2010 Colonic Series: Black Men and Provision

As most of you know, I haven’t done a lot of writing in a while. There have been a few things that I have wanted to write about, but either I haven’t had enough liquid courage to speak freely on it, or my boys at www.singleblackmale.net have been in my head and got it down before I could. So this summer, I’m going to relieve this mental constipation and get these things out of my mind, off of sidebar gchats, and actually get them down and out.

Earlier today I was taking a “smoke break” from work and came across an article posted on facebook by Carrie Pink about how the label of Golddigger placed on Black Women that was written by a commentator in Essence magazine. The commentary’s premise is that Black Men label women as golddiggers in an effort to skate on the man’s responsibility of being the provider. As I read through this, I couldn’t help but wonder where the disconnect is within the Black culture about this notion of provision for the family by the brothas.

The example I grew up with was a very interesting one to say the least, yet not uncommon. Until I was 11, I grew up in a single parent household where it was just me and my mom, until my mom married my stepdad, who then became the head of household. When I was younger, the actual amount of money my parents made didn’t matter to me. What I observed was a partnership between my mom and stepdad, both business and personal, where both of them shared domestic duties around the house, and made joint decisions on how money was spent in the household.  In the end, it was the accountability of my stepdad to ensure that the house was in order, despite who was bringing in the most money, which changed year to year depending on circumstance.

Like most folks, I base my example of a functional marriage off of what I viewed growing up. But as I have made this journey into my now 30′s (reality check: I’m 30 now), I see that there is definitely a disconnect within the African-American culture about what it means for a man to be the provider for the household. You have so many different messages about the partnership piece in a marriage. I dated someone once where the following conversation took place:

Her: No matter how much money I make, even if I make more money than him, he should be able to provide for the entire family on his check.
Me: So what’s happening with your money?
Her: That’s my money, I do what I want with it. If I want to take that money to go to Monte Carlo, I can do that.
Me: So let’s say he has education loans from school that impact his net income.
Her: If that interferes with his ability to take care of me, then that’s not my problem. He’s clearly not husband material. He needs to either get those loans paid off or get a second job to offset.

Of course, a lot of ladies that just read that conversation would side with the female who made those statements. We as men understand our obligation. However, the theory of “what mama taught us” growing up isn’t always reality, a reality that we don’t always fully think through. I had this convo with one of the admins at my job (a white woman), who said that today’s generation doesn’t want to accept reality before they have to learn the hard way in terms of relationships and marriages. Every woman won’t have the luxury to be a stay at home mom who doesn’t work and only takes care of the kids until they’re in the 1st grade; not many men won’t be in a financial position to pay the household bills AND let you be a “real housewife” (hell, even Lisa Wu-Hartwell works even though she’s a “real housewife”, and arguably will bring in more than her husband over the next 10 years). You might have to live in (gasp) an apartment when you first get married. Nothing happens overnight, and it doesn’t happen yesterday either.

We don’t have enough of our predecessors who are having conversations with brothas and sistas our age about how they were a work in progress (both personally and financially), even when they were married. But they worked it out together, reduced debt together, bought a bomb house together, built up thousands in the bank for savings together. However, if you let some women tell it, a man who doesn’t make more money than her, carries any debt, and doesn’t have enough in the bank to buy that Tiffany’s ring in cash and still have enough in the bank to make that 10% down payment for their first home isn’t a real man. In that case, a lot of men wouldn’t become real men until they were in their 40′s (myself included).

Speaking personally, my future wife will be a woman who is willing to be my partner in all aspects of life (notice I said partner, not charity). Now, I personally know a lot of women who are well to do, make their own money, pay their bills on time. However, some of them never emphasize these traits when talking about getting married and building a family. It’s always about the man and what he’s working with, and hardly about what the woman is bringing to the table. Now, us brothas have to take blame for that to an extent in that we don’t ask the right questions as we journey through courting a woman. For me, I need to know my wife would be in a position to support me and/or the family if something were to happen to me (lost job, illness, death). If I don’t see that trait in you, why would I even take you serious as someone I can ask to marry me? I’m not looking to marry Peggy Bundy.

I say all of this to say: RichBrand has no problem being the provider for the family, but I hope I brought clarity to the problem that some brothas have when they hear that statement from sistas. Now, this is not to excuse the reggins who are scrubbing it on your couch and won’t help you pay the bills, those dudes need Jesus and a job application. But I encourage all of you to go back and talk to those who came before you and get the real story on how they made it and got to where they are now. Also, quit having so many conversations with single people; talk to more married folks and get the real scoop. In addition, pay less attention to B E T and pay more attention to G O D when it comes to deciding what, and who, is right for you (not for your friends or classmates, but YOU).

So now I want to open up the floor to the ladies, and share your experiences (whether single or married) with this subject. Fellas, fell free to chime in on this subject as well.

06
Mar
10

The “YardFest” Factor

Back in the day when I was in undergrad, me and some of my boys would always have a conversation about the women we dealt with, and (real talk) we would place them into a certain bucket of priority depending on a number of factors. Here’s a sample conversation that we used to have back then (the names have been changed to protect the innocent):

RichBrand: Hey man, I heard that Girl1′s trying to holla at you.
Dude1: Man, I’m cool on her.
Dude2: But I know you would hit that right?!
(silence)
D2: Rich, come on man, you would hit that right?!
RB: If I could guarantee that only me, her, and God knew about it, then I would consider it ONLY if I got super drunk, but I wouldn’t tell y’all.
D1: LOL That’s cold, but……… I share your sentiment. I’m really trying to smash Girl2 though.
D2: I got you on a round at Dream if you smash that, as long as you not trying to kick it with her and let it be known.
D1: Aight, I’ma hold you to that. Rich, what’s up with you and Girl3 from GW?
RB: Man, she’s cool, fun to hang around with, but……… she’s not as dynamic as the chicks we got classes with.
D2: Yeah man, we spoiled at HU. There some BAD ASS chicks here; you can’t just rock with no arbitrary average chick. D1: So wait, wait, wait……….. Rich, you say GW chick ain’t YardFest material?
RB: Let me put it this way…….. GW chick is comparable to Girl4 from Engineering. I’m saying, would you take her to yardfest?
(silence as everyone has this contemplative, yet Scooby Doo confused look on their face)
RB: Exactly!

If you don’t think those conversations happen once a month at a HBCU (in both men’s AND women’s dorms), then you really got some learning to do. But let me explain a few things for you. For those who have gone to a HBCU, you recognize that because of the afrocentric roots and community culture we embody in school, some of those folks that we have been in midterm battles and graduation war with are like family. These are the people who take notes for you when we have an interview for a job, who make you soup when you’re sick, lend money to you when you’re pledging in need. And for those who are family oriented, when you introduce someone to family, you’re not going to bring around the jumpoff or someone that’s marginal in your eyes.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m in no way saying that the prerequisite is bringing a shiny DIME, but at the same time you must have total peace of mind when you bring that person around “family”. Ask anyone who went to Spelhouse, Howard, or FAMU about the “family reunion” dynamic that is HOMECOMING. Think about it: when that day comes that you are ready to walk through the door of your parents’ house to introduce that one person to them, are you going to bring home someone you’re not sold on? Are you bringing home the unabashed Drew Rat? Granted, college isn’t your real family (per se), but at the same time, it is. There are some married folks to this day who will not bring their spouses to homecoming because they know it’s not gonna be a good look for them to do so (the others actually want to have fun and know their spouse is a tool when it comes to having fun). Granted, your fellow alumni aren’t going home with you, but …….still…..you know?…….. ok anyway………

So for me, there are two key factors that make someone qualify to have the “YardFest” factor:

1. They must be in your “lane”
This one here can be explained by stating the following rhetorical questions:

If you went on from Spelman to become a neurosurgeon who’s very ambitious, are you going to marry a broke shoe salesman?
If you pledged Alpha at Howard, went on to get a JD/MBA and used that knowledge and skill to start your own record label and become a world renowned jazz musician, would you marry a rapper who looked and sounded like this?
I DIDN’T THINK SO!!! Bottom line: the person must be comparable to you and share similar values with you. Granted, you may be a doctor and your boo has a MBA and doesn’t make as much money as you, but they’re AT LEAST in the ballpark. Now if you’re a doctor and your boo’s three favorite words are “Welcome to Walmart”, then you might have an issue. LOL

2. There must be mutual peace of mind and security
When you bring your boo/spouse to the yard, after the first hour that you are out there you should have a good gage on how they feel about the situation. Now if this comes out of their mouth, peace of mind is gone or was never there:
“Baby, you know a lot of great and dynamic people. Wow………….. and you settled for me? Damn, I don’t know what to say.”
However, you know you got someone who knows their worth if this comes out instead:
“Baby, you know a lot of great and dynamic people. Wow………… they most not be that dynamic. They dumb as hell for not locking you up back then. Oh well, I got you now, and you got me. Let’s go get some funnel cakes, fried wings, and mambo sauce.”
Aligned with that, there has to be the peace of mind in you that stops you from indirectly (or directly) disrespecting your relationship by pushing up on that old crush from sophomore year who is STILL fine as hell to you. Trust and believe, I know from experience what it’s like to bring someone around “family” and you’re not sold on them all the way, and that becomes apparent to you, your boo, and the people around you.

In closing, everything I said above is left up to personal interpretation. You have to do what works for you and what you feel comfortable and secure with. The scale is this: If they’re not good enough to take around your real family, you might want to think twice about bringing them around “family”. As I said before, take it from someone who has made this mistake fairly recently and it brought a lot of things to light for me in terms of being more selective about who I bring around to people. Some people don’t care and will bring any ol’ body they please around to their people. As much as you can say “it shouldn’t matter what people think, you shouldn’t care”, to most folks it DOES matter what family and friends think, especially if they want to continue that relationship in their lives. For me, personally, it’s not about stuntin my trophy at Homecoming, it’s about making sure I get it right, and doing it ONCE (i.e. get married).

What do you guys think about this? Have you directly or indirectly used a comparable theory as a factor in someone’s potential or where they measure up to your subjective standard? It’s human to do so, so don’t be PC and lie about it. Let me know your thoughts for real.

25
Feb
10

Independent Black…. Man??

For those who read this blog on the blue moons that I decide to write, I’m usually prone to bringing up the flaws of women when it comes to dealing with how you live life as a whole deal with men, and vice versa. But this time around I’m taking a different approach.

With my current day job, I’m in the process of developing myself into a future leader. Part of that development means taking the time to really understand what it takes to be a leader, and shoring up those competencies that need improvement that I’m not currently displaying. Along with professional development, I’m working on my personal development as well and learning how to be a better man, day by day, one step at a time. Part of any growth opportunity is to lean into discomfort and be willing to accept criticism that comes from others, and also develop the ability to develop self-awareness, realize when you slip up, and find ways to correct your actions and/or methods going forward.

With that being said, over the last week or so, I have been truly thinking about my current state in terms of not being married yet. Over the last few months, I have continued to make tweaks in my approach to the whole endeavor (which I won’t go into detail about right now), and after talking to a few good friends, I have come to this harsh reality about RichBrand…………… I’m a DAMN HYPOCRITE!!!!!

Here’s where I’m going with this: the same things that we seem to knock some women on in terms of what they look for, I can’t even lie, I do my damn self. The same reasons some “independent black women” are single are the EXACT same reasons why I’m single. Some of them are habits I wish I could kick, other habits I’m unabashed about. The truth of the matter is that I’m a single, independent black man. And just like a typical “independent woman”, I do my own thing, make my own money, ambitious in my career, march to the beat of my own drum, and don’t need a woman for anything. Also, I have this sub-conscious “entitlement” that, because I have achieved a certain status in life, I “deserve” a certain caliber of woman in terms of looks, education, profession, and pedigree. And just like women who are comparable, there are as many women attracted to me, because of that drive, ambition, and standard, as there women who are turned off by that.

Why would women be turned off by an ambitious, independent black man? Well, it’s because, as much as we try to front like we are, men are not always good at multi-tasking when it comes to the balance of energy between career progression and building a relationship, especially when you get past a certain age. This becomes key when a black man meets a woman (regardless of race) that is used to and requires worship attention. I am one that refuses to subscribe to that because I honestly feel like I can have and pursue both at the same time; the key is to be in position with God’s plan to pursue both concurrently, which is what this journey is about for me. But I will say this much: just like there are parents telling their children to work hard, build your own, and find the one for you when it comes, I was told the same thing growing up as a young black man in LA. If you notice, most of the couples you see that are married before they are 25 (without a pappy in the background with a shotgun) are married because, chances are, the notion of finding someone you can build your empire with was implanted in them prior to them going to college, and as they journeyed out into the world, that was their focus; unfortunately, finding a wife was a distant second to establishing myself professionally.

Now, am I giving myself a self-prescribed way of dealing with my independence? Not at all. But the first thing you must do when you look to achieve a goal or look to improve in any way is to establish a baseline and know where you stand currently, which is what this entry is about. I know what my goals are, and the journey to the destination will be longer if you don’t understand what obstacles are in your way of getting there. This is my way of holding up the mirror and being 100 with myself, and understanding the nature of the beast that is ME.

09
Jan
10

Access Reverification

For those that know me, you know that since grad school my work experience has centered around Information Risk Management (in both a Big 4 and within the Insurance industry). For my techies out there that are familiar with COBIT controls, you are familiar with two security control objectives, but I will try to explain them in English for those non-techie folks:

DS 5.4 (User Account Management) – This control centers around how you give access and how you take it away.

DS 5.5 (Access Reverification) – This control checks the frequency in which you check (and either verify or invalidate) who has access, and what you do in the event someone has inappropriate access. This control is there in the event DS 5.4 is inadequate.

Best practices dictates that, depending on the level of risk, you should execute this control at least once a year, and the higher the access, the more often you should execute (for example, those with a LOT of access should be checked every 3 months, those with a little you can check once a year).

Ok Rich, where ya going with this????

Here’s the deal: most of us don’t really take the time to analyze who it is that we have in our lives (at all levels), and we wonder why so many people are up in our business, causing havoc, and not adding anything positive at ALL. Think of yourself as a system, and sometimes too many people have inappropriate access to your life. They don’t need to know what you plan to do on your birthday, or know that you’re going to Homecoming, or even know that you’re still alive (and vice versa). So, every once in a while, we all need to go through an Access Reverification to see who’s in our lives, what level of access they have to us, and see if they’re appropriate based on their position. Let me give you an IT-based translation of the levels of access you need to consider when doing this exercise:

No Access: This seems to be self-explanatory to an extent. These are folks that don’t need to have any access to you at all. You may or may not speak to them when you see them on the street, but other than Yardfest at Howard Homecoming or the Morehouse Homecoming Tailgate or the Taste of Chicago, they don’t need to speak to you or see you again. These are folks who have no purpose in your life at all; they don’t even need to connected to you on Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, etc.

Read-Only Access: These folks can be connected to you on all of the sites I mentioned above, and might even leave a message or two every once in a while, but outside of them sending you a tweet or writing on their wall once every 6 months, these are folks you keep at arms length distance from you. They don’t need to see anything of you more than what you publish (just like some of the people who are reading this blog as this very moment).

Admin Access: These folks go beyond Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter. These are people that you share IM’s with, you’re always writing on each other’s walls, and you even chat it up with on the phone at least once a month (maybe even more), hell, you might even hang out on occasion.  These people might know how your day at work was, you might know what she plans to cook for her husband tonight, or what restaurant he’s taking his wife to for their anniversary dinner (before it actually happens). They don’t know everything that’s going on with you, but they know enough to say that they know you. But they don’t know you as well as your……..

Super Users: This group of people know your past, your present, and most likely are part of your future. They know your weaknesses, your hopes, your dreams, your plans in a manner that hardly anyone outside of God knows. These folks can reach you at least 90% of the time 24/7 (and vice versa). This usually consists of close friends and family; pretty much, the people you love (or that you are courting in some cases).

Now when you think of these categories, think of the people in your life, where they stand, what lane they should be in. Sometimes, within our busy lives, we neglect to do this inventory, and/or our DS 5.4 is not on point. We don’t do enough due diligence as to who we let into our lives,  or how adequate the exfoliation of folks from our lives is. There are folks who you might stay connected to on facebook and linkedin, and might hit them occasionally with an IM, but they don’t need to be in your iphone. Then there are folks who you might know, you might see them once a month, you went to undergrad with this person, they might be your frat bro or soror, but they don’t need to know anything other than what they see when they see you on the street.

With that being said, I challenge each of you to take inventory of the people in your lives and ensure their access to you is “appropriate”. You will realize that some folks have to go, and some folks need to have their access adjusted. It’s not going to be a quick and easy exercise, but it’s something that we deal with in Corporate America to protect the information and privacy of our customers and the reputation of our shareholder image. After all, the person with the wrong access can abuse that access and do something they’re not supposed to do. Why would you risk someone doing the same with you?

28
Dec
09

Why is WE Single (2010 Version) Part II: Stand Up, Stand Out

Back in 2005, I wrote a blog about Why black men and women are single, based on random thoughts I had after listening to a segment on the Michael Baisden radio show that talked about the same topic. Some of the key thoughts that I pointed out in that blog back then were the following: men and women are less likely to hold each other accountable for character in lieu of the “big Joker” (for men, our trump card is money or that “good good”, for women it’s looks), men and women are less likely to acknowledge their own shortcomings and why that’s holding them back.

Over the last few years I have talked about black women who end up in unfulfilled relationships because they settle, men and women who use their “trump card” as an excuse to be lazy in their approach to dating and relationships, women who don’t know the Trinity, what most good men consider a beautiful woman, and have also spoken on how we let psychological factors block our blessing in finding the right person for us. But to take us into 2010, I want to upgrade my thoughts from 2005 and give my readers a new perspective that you must factor in. This is a 2-part blog that will talk about what we can do to improve black relationships in 2010.

In Part I, I talked about knowing what type of person you are and knowing who’s compatible with you and focusing your dating to that type of person, and not a person’s resume (per se).  With that being said, here’s Part II:

Last week, ABC Nightline featured a segment on the plight of Single Black Women and how there is a shortage of eligible black men (meaning they are educated, heterosexual, employed, and no criminal record) for them to be aligned to in holy matrimony, let alone fall in love with (which as my Phi Sig bro Doogie pointed out is missing in this equation, but that’s another story). The segment talked about four women who reside in Atlanta who range from their late 20′s to mid 30′s who all say they are running into the same issues in regards to finding good (enough) black men to date. All four of these women would be women that most men would date based on looks along (if we knew nothing else), but for some reason are still out there and open to being with the right man for them.

My Challenge to the Men:
As Steve Harvey alluded to in this same segment, the example of what a “good black man” should be is missing in the rearing of most black men in our society today. This has been a downtrend since the 60′s when more black men were taken out of the home and either put in jail or on drugs, which then provided the blueprint for the decline of black men in our society today. Without black men in the home to be that positive example for how men should treat women, and how women should expect to be treated, it has caused a disconnect in the way we interact today as black men and women. However, black men need to stop using this 50 year old excuse (and the slavery excuse) as to why we are the way that we are, because there is NO EXCUSE for how some of us treat black women, NONE. Granted, we need to be aware of how societal changes have blurred the line of gender roles, but there are certain things that we as men should still do as the head of household, as the MAN (and show those qualities when courting a woman): Know how to manage the household budget (regardless of who makes the most money), be a spiritual, mental, and emotional advisor for your wife and children, protect the family physically from any dangerous element (does not mean you have to be a MMA fighter or Dirty Harry, but have enough common sense to get your girl out the club if something’s about to pop off, for example), and protect your woman in other ways by doing right by her (for example, don’t be an infidel, and if you are going to mess up and step out, USE PROTECTION so that you don’t do what Magic Johnson almost did and bring home an STD to his wife). Granted, brothas, we are not always going to be perfect (and a good woman knows that), but what we must be at ALL times is accountable and responsible for who we are, and what we do to ourselves and to other people (we’re held to that standard at work, it’s not different behind closed doors). Our black women are demanding that more of us stand up and take back our place in our society. We can’t try to make it happen, you have to decide within yourself (if you haven’t already done so) to do you part in taking our place back, to STAND UP and be a man. In the words of Yoda “Do or do not, there is no try.”

Challenge to the Ladies:
In the same segment, there was talk about how the requirements of some women can be somewhat unrealistic and unfair. Steve Harvey brings up the point that there are some women who are very well off, yet require a man who has more than them. “If you make $150k, does that mean he has to make $150k or more?!” In the case of some women, they still hold to this standard and wonder why they run into nothing but Broke Black Men. Well, if making less than $100k is broke, then you are going to eliminate even more men that way than with any other metric you may have. In the mind of some women, that’s considered settling, especially if they are on the better side of the aesthetic or financial tree. Here’s the thing ladies: if you are successful and “got it going on”, dating a man who makes less money than you is not necessarily DATING DOWN, contrary to what momma taught you.
Now for those ladies who already got that memo, a man’s not going to get at you (and keep his attention only on you) just because you’re cute, got a degree , have a job, can cook, clean, and is unselfish in bed; it takes more than that. Hate to say it but, there are thousands of women just like you who live in your city that have that (and we won’t even talk about the skew of the numbers at HBCU’s), AND more. Any man who knows the ratio and understands his own self-worth is going to want to know what is it about you that makes you stand out; what is that WOW factor that will make you better than the next chick; your mere existence is NOT ENOUGH to stop you from getting rejected. Keep in mind that what might WOW me is not going to WOW my boy or my line brother or WOW Shaq or WOW Lebron. So think on what makes you STAND OUT and makes you a differentiator outside of your money, your assets, and your looks.

Challenge to Both:
This one is pretty simple; realize that NOBODY’s perfect. The one for you is not going to have everything you (feel you) need from your potential mate, but at the same time do not just settle with the aim of completing your life accomplishment checklist or meeting a deadline. Does it matter that he/she doesn’t come from the same pedigree as you? Does it matter that he/she has to love (only) hip-hop music and jazz lovers need not apply? Does it matter what org they pledged, or that he/she dated someone that you are loosely connected to within one of the orgs you’re apart of? Does it matter how many friends of the opposite sex he/she has? Does it matter that he/she has a 4 inch random hair that grows somewhere on his/her body that makes you go “arrrruuuuuuuu”? Does it matter that he/she is a Lakers or Celtics fan? Does his/her past matter as much to you as you want yours to matter to him/her?
We all have the tendency to be judgmental about the people we encounter for one reason or another, but think about how many blessings (personal and professional) that have been denied or deferred to you because you were not positioned to receive them or because we let “our peeps” put doubts in our head.

As I challenge myself in 2010 to do self-assessment on myself and what I need to go to accomplish my professional and personal goals, I challenge you all to do the same and to stop building bridges to nowhere and monuments of nothingness, because all that does is put you right back to square one every time. Realize that we are ALL a work in progress, and God’s not through with us yet until he calls us home. So everyday you wake up, think of a way of how you will improve yourself, how you will step into your calling as a man/woman, and how you will become the obvious choice. Life’s not a game people, and working your faith is mandatory.

28
Dec
09

Why is WE Single (2010 Version) Part I: Know your type.

Back in 2005, I wrote a blog about Why black men and women are single, based on random thoughts I had after listening to a segment on the Michael Baisden radio show that talked about the same topic. Some of the key thoughts that I pointed out in that blog back then were the following: men and women are less likely to hold each other accountable for character in lieu of the “big Joker” (for men, our trump card is money or that “good good”, for women it’s looks), men and women are less likely to acknowledge their own shortcomings and why that’s holding them back.

Over the last few years I have talked about black women who end up in unfulfilled relationships because they settle, men and women who use their “trump card” as an excuse to be lazy in their approach to dating and relationships, women who don’t know the Trinity, what most good men consider a beautiful woman, and have also spoken on how we let psychological factors block our blessing in finding the right person for us. But to take us into 2010, I want to upgrade my thoughts from 2005 and give my readers a new perspective that you must factor in. This is a 2-part blog that will talk about what we can do to improve black relationships in 2010.

Here’s Part I:

I had an interesting conversation with my aunt over this holiday break about “what’s wrong with me”.  The conversation started based on a conversation I had a couple of weeks prior with a friend of mine about how “basic Betty Rubble” chicks always seem to be likely to get married, and why good men seem to flock to these women. My aunt mentioned that with men, she has learned that it’s not always about looks and it’s more about who fits their personality and their values. She broke it down for me about how there are 4 types of people: Needy, Caretaking, Independent Caretakers, and the Selfish Independent. Here’s a quick breakdown of each:

1. Needy: This person is someone who, although they may work and have an education, have a sense of dependence on another person in order for them to be complete and/or to survive. For example, there are some men who can’t cook or clean because mom always did it for them, and unless they know how to do it themselves, they need someone to do that for them (see Jody from “Baby Boy” and most of the pretty women you know as an example).

2. Caretaking: This person is someone who strives on being the provider (whether they provision is financial, domestic, physical, or all of the above). This is who we refer to as “Capt. Save ‘em” because they want to feel that their mate wouldn’t be complete without them; the void filler of sorts (“don’t worry baby, I can do this for you since you can’t do it for yourself”).

3. Independent Caretaker (or Interdependent): This person is someone who has no problem doing their own thing. They can provide for themselves in most ways that matter, but at the same time this person is looking for someone to grow with them and be their partner in the relationship. This person is someone with caretaking abilities, but will not take care of just anyone. Yes, they have no problem taking care of you, but they will require you to bring something to the table that shows you can do the same. (For those who know (or don’t know me), this is the category I fall in).

4. Selfish Independent: This is Mr/Ms. “I’ma do Me” to the fullest. They’re like the Addams Family (Hammer Version), where they do, say, live, play how they want to, and you can’t tell them otherwise. They don’t need anyone in their lives, and are so narcissistic about themselves and their goals and ambitions that no one else can fit in. These are likely your 40-year old bachelors who have never been married, don’t have any kids, who act like they are still 21, or a handful of career women who are looking to make their way to the top in their field and won’t stop til it happens.

Now that I have broken it down, depending on which person you think you fall into, here’s who you are most compatible with, depending on where they are in their life at the time.

Needy: You can only date a person who’s a caretaker who doesn’t require interdependence (hence why most pretty women are trained to go after a man with money and/or provides them the same benefits they were provided by their parental units).
Caretakers: Since you thrive on taking care of someone, your type is usually someone who is either a interdependent who will appreciate your services or a needy person. The key is that as a caretaker you must feel needed and/or wanted, and even if you don’t, you’re still going to be who you are.
Interdependent: As mentioned before, you have caretaking abilities, but will not show that side of yourself for anyone who you feel cannot bring a comparable package to the table, so your type is either another interdependent who you can partner with or a caretaker who will hold you down when you go through a turn in life. Needy people need not apply because sometimes they have issue with reciprocity and gratitude, so this will drive you crazy and most likely will force you to kick them to the curb if they don’t have any “act right”.
Selfish: Which do you prefer: manual or alkaline? (Forrest Gump voice) That’s all I have to say about that.

At one point or another, we have all fallen in and out of each of these categories, then we also have a category that we are normalized to be in for the most part. The reason why I brought this to light is because sometimes both men and women have the tendency to fall into a trap of dating the same type of person who falls into certain surface prerequisites (per se) and wondering why it doesn’t work out. It’s key that you identify these type of people (without prejudging them) to better focus your pool of potentials to save you less time (and money in some cases).

Let me know your thoughts on this. If you have none, go on to Part 2.

10
Dec
09

The Rejection Letter

Allow me to get this thought off of my mind…………….

In this bad economy, and unemployment still at a high level (and being reported inaccurately, but that’s another topic for another day), one thing that those in the job market have gotten used to are those thin letters from those many companies you dropped resumes with on Monster.com that say something to this effect:

“Thank you for expressing your interest in a position with (blank) Inc. and taking the time to interview with us. Although we enjoyed speaking with you and found your credentials impressive, we can no longer pursue your candidacy at this time and have decided to pursue candidates whose qualifications are more aligned to our needs. We will keep your resume on file for 6 (or 12) months in the event that a position more aligned with your skills comes along. Please keep in mind that its our company policy to not share feedback with candidates. We wish you the best of luck in your future career endeavors.”

I’m sure for those of you who are in graduate/professional school and/or have been in the job market in the last several years has received at least one letter comparable to this via snail mail or email. And after a while you become immune to getting them from a variety of companies. Some hit you more than others because you really wanted that job or wanted to work in that city or in the same building as that fine ass specimen you saw when you rolled to corporate headquarters to interview. As someone who spent up to a year out of work post-undergrad, I know the feeling all too well when a company rejects you, and you have to sit there and figure out why. But the why is not what this blog is about.

Now……….. just imagine for a moment………… think about your love/dating life……….. what if you adopted this method for getting rid of that dude/chick that you weren’t interested in? Now, most of us rely on the consulting firm method, which consists of ignoring phone calls, and just never calling the other person back, and hope they get the memo and move on (comparable to what Deloitte or Booz and Company will do).  Now I understand how this is the safe method and allows you to not be the bad guy and make ourselves feel better about the situation. But………… I wonder if someone would have the nerve to hit someone with a letter like this:

“Thank you expressing your interest in me romantically and taking the time to hang out with me. The talks were cool as hell. Even though you’re a cool and nice person, I’m just not that into you and decided to start talking to people that are more my type. I’ll keep your number in my phone in the event that you become my type 5 years from now or I get bored and either need a free meal or need to get some, but by all means feel free to lose mine. I’m not going to get into why I don’t like you, because it won’t help at this point. But I hope you find what you’re looking for, just know it won’t be me.

PS I’m serious……….lose my number.”

Now, your best bet if you ever want to try this method is to go green and send it via an email and them immediately put rules up on the inbox to delete any incoming mail from the other person’s email address (like you can do on gmail, for example).

I’m sure you’re reading this and thinking that this is a cold method of telling someone you’re done with them and are not interested. But in the game of love, rejection comes with the territory. The presence of imperfection leads to the risk of rejection, and whether it’s in our professional or personal lives, we have to deal. But with rejection, honesty is always the best policy and lowers your risk of being stalked. LOL

Anyone bold enough to try this out-the-box method to dump those bug-a-boo’s? Let me know your thoughts.




Enter your email address to subscribe to my blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 434 other followers

UnMastered Collection Vol. I

Topics

Archives

 

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 434 other followers